[RSS] [Bloglines] [Google] [My Yahoo!] [RSS VALID ?]

 

Burma Democratic Cencern
| HOME | ABOUT BURMA | ABOUT BDC | PRESS & MEDIA | AUNG SAN SUU KYI | MONKS | EVENT | CAMPAIGNS | LINKS | BDC BURMESE |
| BURMA 2008 CONSTITUTION | 1990 ELECTION | PETITIONS | TAKE ACTIONS | HUMAN RIGHTS | POLITICAL PRISONERS | CONTACT US |
Friendship JOIN AND SUPPORT
Red Arrow JOIN AND SUPPORT US
Red Arrow MEMBERS AREA
Red Arrow MAKE DONATION
Paypal Logo
ACTIVITIES
BAYDA National Building Institute Activities
Activities
BDC meeting with 88 Generation Student Leaders Min Ko Naing
Activities
Camera PHOTO OF THE WEEK
History
TV MEDIA TV NEWS
Daw Aung San Suu Kyi winning by-election: Can she rule Burma?
Media Video File
Burma Democratic Concern (BDC) Supporting Kachin Brothers Calling for Peace
Media Video File
Burma Democratic Concern (BDC): Discussion on Economics
Media Video File
Myo Yan Naung Thein on Flourishing CSOs and CBOs in Burma
Media Video File
HeadPhone LISTEN AUDIO ONLINE
Arrow BDC discussion on Rule of Law, Education, Aung San Suu Kyi 's Speeches
Arrow BDC on William Hague Visit
Arrow WHYS 30: The show is live from Rangoon in Burma today
Arrow Sunday Talk with Ko Phyo Min Thein, Ko Myo Yan Naung Thein and Ko Soe Htun
Arrow BDC welcomes Burma’s Patriotic Military Network (19 April 2011)
Arrow BDC Met with Japanese Officials (05 Mar 2011)
Arrow Differences in Japan and Burma Aids
Arrow Sunday round table
Arrow 63rd anniversary of Burma’s Independence Day (04 Jan 2011)
Arrow Shock Shi-Tae Music
More
 

SAFFRON REVOLUTION

Monks beaten by soldiers The phrase "Saffron Revolution" is the name appeared after 2007 demonstrations to describe the protests of the the saffron-colored robes widely associated with Buddhist monks, who were at the forefront of the demonstrations against military dictatorship in Burma.

Burmese monks have taken part in protests in the past, against British colonial rule and against a half-century of rule by military dictatorship. Their resistance to the British produced the most prominent political martyr of Burmese Buddhism, U Wisara, who died in prison in 1929 after a 166-day hunger strike. In 1988, there were a lot of demonstrations took place in Rangoon, led by monks and students. These demonstrations were brutally repressed by the military killing thousands of monks, students and activists. Eventually, after the bloodshed, they can manage to topple the Ne Win led dictatorship. But sadly, another military came to power and rule the country with abosulte authority.

The cost of basic commodities were rising continuously and in late 2006, rice, eggs, and cooking oil are increasing by 30-40%. The living standards in Burma is distinguish in the fact that many of the high ranking army generals and their connected families have become immensely rich and on the other hand normal people are distressfully rely on their little earning . On August 15, 2007 the government removed subsidies on fuel causing a rapid and unannounced increase in prices. The government raised prices from about $1.40 to $2.80 a gallon, and boosted the price of natural gas by about 500%. This increase in fuel prices led to an increase in food prices.

Long term suffering of the economic distress as well as living under the injustice system of the government makes the people took to the streets to protest the current conditions. In response to the protests, the government began arresting and beating demonstrators. The government arrested 13 prominent Burmese dissidents including Min Ko Naing, Ko Ko Gyi, Min Zeya, Ko Jimmy, Ko Pyone Cho, Arnt Bwe Kyaw and Ko Mya Aye.

On September 5, 2007, Burmese troops forcibly broke up a peaceful demonstration in Pakokku and injured three monks. The military refused to apologize the demanding by the deadline of September 17. This sparked the huge number of monks involving in the protests. Their role in the protests was significant due to the reverence paid to them by the civilian population and the military. After these events, protests began spreading across Burma, including Rangoon, Sittwe, Pakokku and Mandalay.

The biggest antigovernment protests in two decades, some barefoot monks held their alms receiving bowls upside down before them instead of asking for their daily donations of food. It was a shocking image in the devoutly Buddhist nation. The monks were refusing to receive alms from the military rulers and their families — effectively excommunicating them from the religion that is at the core of Burmese culture. The military rules by force, but the monks retain ultimate moral authority. Receiving alms and donation is a ritual that expresses a profound bond between the ordinary Buddhist and the monk. The people are feeding the monks and the monks are helping the people make merit, when you refuse to accept, you have broken the bond that has tied them for centuries together.

The country’s two largest and most established institutions, the monkhood and the military, were facing each other, both made up of about 500,000 strong young men. Tens of thousands of Burmese people led by these monks took to the streets of Rangoon demanding for change. The Buddhist monks, hold nothing but non violent and loving kindness, had no way of resisting soldiers with guns. The military junta in Burma views religion as a threat to its sovereignty. Rejected by both its spiritual and moral bases, the junta that has ruled for 19 years had little to fall back on but force. It unleashed its troops to shoot, beat, arrest and kill the saffron-robed monks. Soldiers surrounded monasteries; preventing monks from leading further demonstrations — or from making their morning rounds to collect the alms that feed them.

The military generals had embarked on a campaign of violence against Buddhist monks. In retribution for leading protest marches, monks were beaten and arrested, many monks were disrobed, and several monasteries were raided, ransacked, and closed. Currently, there are more than 2000 political prisoners in Burma.

A U.N. investigator revealed that at least 31 people were killed, but anti-junta groups have said that close to 200 lives were lost. The junta grip on power has never been secure. They have ruled through a force that keeps order through intimidation. They have held the pro-democracy leader, Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, under house arrest for 12 of the last 18 years. Crack down on democracy activists continue everyday by arresting dissidents, interrogate, torture and put them in prison.
 
Monks Logo MONKS
Red Arrow SAFFRON REVOLUTION
Red Arrow PROMINENT LEADERS
CONTACT US
Blank Burma: From Dictatorship to Democracy and now is the time for Democracy to Development

22 April 2013

Burma Democratic Concern (BDC) warmly welcomes EU lifting sanction on Burma. Since the reform process taking shape in Burma, Burma Democratic Concern (BDC) has been calling for international community to remove sanction on Burma given that sanction inevitably infringe Burmese people right to development due to the spillover effect and reputation risk. Development is the Human Rights and belongs to everyone. In 1986, the United Nations General Assembly adopted the Declaration on the Right to Development which defines right to development as economic, social, cultural and political development.

Burma in transition from Dictatorship to Democracy is facing challenges ahead to tackle such as poverty, diseases, hunger, deforestation, resource exploitation, militarisation of economy, market monopolisation and conflicts which all hold back development. Burma needs to provide her citizens with quality education, affordable health and accessible energy especially electricity which are the important factors working for development of a nation and the best ways to reduce poverty and boost shared prosperity. Well being of the Burmese people should be the centre of development and we must work promoting women participation in every aspect of Burma's road toward Democracy to Development.

While we enjoy celebrating EU removing sanction on Burma, we are very saddened to learn that New York based (so-called) Human Rights Watch (HRW) is promoting biased and unreliable fabricated stories on its 2013 Human Rights report regarding Arakan (Rakhine) conflict.

Human Rights Watch Report 2013 on Burma regarding recent communal violence in Arakan (Rakhine) state is not credible and biased. We totally reject the term using “Ethnic Cleansing” by Human Rights Watch. Human Rights Watch (HRW) should respect the ethics of the NGO when they are writing reports especially very sensitive issues like religion0-related matters. Reporting parallel to Arakan (Rakhine) conflict which is mainly to do with immigration issues with Meithtila communal conflict is misleading since they are different subjects with different contexts. They should have the integrity on analyzing each and every cases and not by drawing assumptions by jumping on misleading conclusions with bias reports. They should also look into details of the root causes of each and every conflicts. Our country is in transition state and we believe that the international community should help us moving forward. Therefore, we call for Human Rights Watch to stop stirring the stability of Burma, stop promoting hatred and stop spreading the wrong reports regarding Arakan (Rakhine) conflict and Meithtila conflict.

As clearly stated in State Department country report that “Rohingya do not dispute their origins from present day East Bengal”, we believed that it has been clarified that they are not indigenous people of Burma and Arakan (Rakhine) issue must be dealt in accord with Burma Immigration Law and Citizenship Law. We would like to point out here that what had happened in Arakan (Rakhine) state is communal violence and not religiously perpetrated. Inserting and labeling the religious context in the Arakan (Rakhine) conflict is inappropriate and totally wrong. We believe that Human Rights Watch (HRW) is deliberately manipulate and exploit the Arakan (Rakhine) conflict so as to get attention from religious extremists around the world to commit atrocities against Burmese people and as they had expected various religious extremist groups had been calling for genocide against Burmese. We warn Human Rights Watch that they will be held accountable for any further consequences for their irresponsible comment on this particular matter. We call for Burmese government, ethnic leaders, student leaders, religious leaders and opposition leaders as well as all the Burmese citizens to challenge the Human Rights Watch Report 2013 on Burma using the term “Ethnic Cleansing” relating to Arakan (Rakhine) conflict.

Burma Democratic Concern (BDC) calls for international community to help us marching on road toward Democracy to Development in Burma.

For more information please contact Burma Democratic Concern (BDC) at:

U Myo Thein [UK], Director, Phone: 00-44-740-28-595-28

U Khin Maung Win [USA], Director, Phone: 001-941-961-2622

Daw Khin Aye Aye Mar [USA], Patron, Phone: 001 509-783-7223

U Tint Swe Thiha [USA], Patron, Phone: 001 509- 545-3066

More
PRESS RELEASE
Buttom
OBJECTIVES
Free Burma
Free Burma
Free Burma
 
© 1988 - 2013 BDC™ THE BURMA DEMOCRATIC CONCERN